Archive for December, 2008

New Revisions for the New Year

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

I finally updated the Wordpress software underlying this blog from 2.3 to the newest, 2.7. It seemed to go pretty well, although in the database conversion there appear to have been some random garbage characters introduced to the entries… I tried my best to find them all, but there may be some lurking here or there. There may also be some undiscovered issues, not everything possible has been tested.

Because of some security enhancements in the newer version, I am opening up comments on the most recent posts. You still have to create a user name, and the first entry you make will have to be moderated (approved by me). The main purpose of the moderation is not censorship of legitimate discussion (including dissent from my impeccable ideas), but to stop the use of the board as a forum for advertising links to the tawdry side of the internet.

Mile Road Tax Madness

Monday, December 29th, 2008

I read in the news that Oregon has successfully tested a mileage-based transportation use tax to replace their gas tax, using a GPS based technology to calculate the mileage. Perhaps we can point out that this proposal will be a regressive tax plan, because while everyone will pay per mile, the current proposal means that the heavier vehicles (SUVs) will pay the same per-mile tax as lighter, more efficient vehicles which create less wear on the roads. Thus, it will reduce the economic incentives to buy smaller vehicles, because fuel will cost less and the “road tax” will be the same (all that could change between the proposal as it stands and the eventual law that would have to be passed).

I have no doubt though that Oregon will fall victim to the very technology they think is going to reward them with greater revenues. As soon as they begin to depend on an electronic metering system, schemes to defeat the system will pop up all over. They want the auto manufacturers to help them implement this. In spite of the fact that there is a Federal law against modifying the built-in software that controls the engine and ultimately the mileage and emission control systems, replacement chips are available that improve engine performance, usually at the expense of mileage and pollution.

Generally, people most interested in boosting their car performance (think rice-rockets) are the main users of these modifications, and making these changes is not done based on an economic incentive, but by a love for their automobile and a fascination with performance or racing. If given a method that will significantly bypass taxes, large numbers of people will take the opportunity to cheat, and other people will craft ways to supply them the means, for a fee. You merely need to look at what has happened to cigarette sales versus consumption in the high-tax states to figure out that people are being supplied with untaxed cigarettes, in spite of it being against the law.

Lastly, the integrity of the system depends on the metering device and the vehicle remaining together. If you could swap one unit for another, then one unit would be used for most driving, the other substituted when reporting time comes. A GPS unit left sitting in a garage won’t record the mileage added to the vehicle.

A lot of opposition has been generated by fears that the information will also be used for tracking. While this is denied by the proposers, the changes in location information is the entire basis of the technology, and I have no doubt that some history data will be retained for at least some portion of the last time period, probably on the premise that it is needed to determine if the unit is operating properly. It will then be just a matter of time until the police begin accessing this information during investigations. Don’t forget that the time difference between location changes can calculate your speed, so police won’t need radar units any longer, they could just pull people over, hook a computer up to the metering device and write tickets for any speeding. That would be a revenue enhancer, for sure.

I don’t doubt there are cleverer schemes that will be devised to bypass any mileage metering devices, but it only took me a few moments to think of these. While I don’t live in Oregon, or even close to it, and will not directly be affected, it looks like a boneheaded proposal to me, with a plenty of room for misuse, to boot.

“Your papers, please…”

Saturday, December 27th, 2008

I get very distraught over creeping losses of civil liberties. I am most upset at my experience last night on Interstate 10. For those unfamiliar with it, this highway runs East-West across the Southern U.S., and in places is a few handfuls of miles from (but parallel to) the U.S.-Mexico Border.

Over the holiday I travelled this route between Texas and Arizona and back. There are several locations in Texas and New Mexico where the U.S. Border Patrol has a huge roofed area beside the highway, and at seemingly random times they put up cones and make all traffic exit the highway and pass through under the direction of government agents. In the past I always felt that they were engaged in “racial profiling” for Mexican immigrants as well as criminal profiling for drug smugglers (I do not fit either profile, although I am 1/8 Mexican). I have never had to stop, being waved through, but the process is annoying (it is legal because Congress expanded the Border Patrol authority to do their work within some number of miles of the border).

Last night, at a stop of East-bound vehicles in Texas, every vehicle had to stop. While an agent with a drug sniffing dog checked my Jeep, another agent asked me where I was going, and then asked whether I was a U.S. citizen (Yes, I am). I was not forced to show any I.D.

While under CURRENT law this is legal, I am incensed about it. I never left the country. Blanket stops of intrastate traffic by the Border Patrol is unwarranted and is clearly against the spirit, but apparently not the letter (thank you Supreme Court), of the U.S. Constitution.

I plan to take the steps needed to bring this out into the open, and to allow people to become educated about the continual losses of liberty to the creeping bureaucracy. Not to mention the wasted funds (contributed by the very citizens they do not trust) for the dozen or better agents on duty but having only two out actually doing the work.

I intend to add more on this… it is a prime example of creeping U.S. Governmental Imperialism, and it must be reversed. So I will be working on making the light shine on their dark practices.

Windows Vista Ultimate Travails, Part II

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

I promised to follow up on my Windows Vista “Anytime” upgrade to Ultimate. Although the representative told me it was coming Federal Express (I assumed Ground service), he lied, it came snail mail, but it took less than a week (well, not much less, six days) to get here. It was only a cardboard mailer with two DVDs and a sticker with a key code in it, not a fancy retail package. Appropriate packaging for a direct support item, but one DVD was the same as what I already had, why didn’t someone thing to package the other DVD in the first place?

The upgrade is done, and it works, seemingly well. It automatically recognized that it was an upgrade, and it gave me a choice of upgrade or a fresh install, and I chose what I wanted, the upgrade. Since it is Microsoft, as you would expect from prior experience, some parts of the process were simply poorly executed. It took around three hours. On a quad-core machine. Truly poor performance there. And the usual aggravations were present when the upgrade was finally finished and the last restart (yes, it restarted at least three times during the process) ended. Options that were already set in the previous version needed set again. The home page for Internet Explorer was reset to a Microsoft site. That rates a big fail in netiquette, and every antivirus program monitors against that. Of course, you can’t run an antivirus while doing a Windows installation, so Microsoft gets away with doing it. Every commercial opportunity is explored.

Media Player insisted I set some options, one of them was what media store I wanted… no doubt the commercial opportunity to sell some music was the underlying reason my previous lack of a choice was not propagated.

Vista also has an annoying issue where it creates .ini files in directories, including one named desktop.ini in the desktop directory, which places an annoying icon on the desktop. The upgrade process left two of these on the desktop. They are deletable, but why even appear is annoying. I have things set up a certain way because it is the way I want them, and I get used to things being laid out that way.

In final measure, the upgrade succeeded, but not without irritating me needlessly. And of course, a terribly inefficient, slow and cumbersome process. Typical MS BS.

Net Neutrality and Common Carriage

Monday, December 15th, 2008

Today there was an article in the Wall Street Journal that hinted that Google was backing away from Net Neutrality by their proposal to some ISPs to co-locate a server on the ISP premises. The article was revealing, in some ways, about other players that previously supported Net Neutrality (think Microsoft) but have backed away in the recent past.

My opinion is that the server co-location, and additional rental paid for the space, power and other costs (including a return on investment.. a profit) are just a business model, to the extent that this would save the cost of having an extremely high-speed connection between Google and the ISP by using a slower connection and cacheing content locally. As long as this arrangement was available to all, and the server had no routing priority over equivalent connections from elsewhere, it would not violate any neutrality.

The concept behind Net Neutrality is based on an old idea, the Common Carrier. This dates back to stagecoaches, trains, sailing ships and caravans, and is the concept that a business of getting a passenger or package from here to there is different from running a business that includes exclusively delivering your own products. When you deliver what you make, as a dairy company might have once done, you can be expected to give your business the priority it needs.

But when you set yourself up to be in the business of delivery for fee, then Common Carriage adds in a concept of fairness, where those that pay the same price should get the same service. It’s a pretty simple idea, and has been around a lot longer than the internet has. And it has been applied to companies that carry messages, from telegrams to phone to microwave to satellite. The business of carrying internet signals (as differentiated from creating internet signals) is not significantly different from any previous communications from the standpoint of its standing as a common carrier.

This argument is not that an ISP should be prohibited from providing customers different levels of service, differentiated by overall speed or even bandwidth limits (a loathesome concept that will likely eventually die for competitive reasons). But the higher speed service should make everything faster, not just some favored flavor of signal, such as video. Because then ISPs will be able to start slowing down popular services, by either type (video) or content provider (YouTube) to provide an incentive that customers get a faster connection package or that the content provider pays a fee (tribute). If we allow it, it is inevitable that this will be done. You shouldn’t blame the companies, it’s in the nature of business to explore all avenues of revenue enhancement (and indeed those that do not will fail).

But we can “just say no” to this by retaining common carriage for all Internet Service Providers. Nothing in the concept would prohibit them from becoming content providers themselves, provided that they have no better access for the customer than competing content providers. While the internet itself is new and parts of it are revolutionary, the neutrality concept is not, and there is plenty of precedent to go by in demanding that the internet also play fair.

Matt’s Phony Hits

Monday, December 15th, 2008

The Drudge Report recently bragged about how many hits they had. The election season should always be a big time for sites like his, and he certainly has earned his success through much effort.

However, a great number of those “hits” are caused by a script on his page that reloads the webpage every 3 minutes. Of course, it reappears with a different ad on it. The entire process is pretty annoying, because in the middle of studying his headlines, the whole page goes blank and then reloads.

I would hope the people buying advertising know that this happens, and that the number of hits they see reported has been inflated by technology. While this would not increase the number of unique visitors to the site, it would increase the hits for multiple ads served to the same user.

While I have nothing against changing ads, nor any problems with him collecting something for the work he puts into running the site, how he does this is annoying and the page reloads are far too frequent. I don’t have a lightning-fast connection like some people, so I never leave his page open on a tab because invariably it will decide to reload when I am waiting for something else to load, slowing down what I am doing. That annoys me terribly.

If I was not attracted to the content on his site, I find the process annoying enough that I would probably never visit the site at all. It is like reading something, and having the paper grabbed away and then put back in your hands in a few seconds. From a user perspective, this is annoying and impolite… yes, even if it is a machine and software, I think the designers owe some common old “good manners” to users.

If it doesn’t work right, don’t allow it do something awful in place of what you want.

A Microsoft Catch-22

Wednesday, December 10th, 2008

I am going to try to hold down the tone of my displeasure with the events so far. From the title, you know this is about Microsoft, and what I started out to do has been to upgrade my Windows Vista Home Premium to Ultimate, which I wanted mostly because it will do an automatic shadow copy backup.

This upgrade process starts out simple, you just click on a program in Settings for an “Anytime” upgrade, and you find yourself at a Microsoft website, where you give them a credit card and address, and after tax and shipping are added you get promised your product will ship in 2 to 4 weeks. In my case, the package arrived via snail mail exactly two weeks after the order.

Since I am used to getting things in half that time, or the next day from places like Amazon, this is an underwhelming performance standard. But that isn’t the real story. I got the current version of Windows Vista pre-installed on my shiny new 64-bit computer. So what is installed is the 64-bit version of Windows Vista, which among other things allows more than 3 GB of memory to be used. I have 4 GB in this machine, and it is capable of holding 8 GB.

So when I get this slow-motion delivery from Microsoft, which is specifically marked as a Home Premium to Ultimate Upgrade package, the DVD inside is clearly marked “32-bit only”. It has a URL printed in the package that you can go to order the 64-bit version (ha, ha). When you get there, you have to type in your entire product key and a six-character captcha code. After you do that, it chugs away for a while and offers you only the 32-bit CD version of the upgrade for $9.95 (plus tax). No other choices.

There is a page link there that has information on 64-bit systems. It says that Ultimate includes 32-bit and 64-bit versions. But when I tried to install the DVD disk I received, it refused to install because it was the 32-bit version and I have the 64-bit version installed. What I learned later is that the Retail packs have both versions in them (on separate disks) but the Anytime Upgrade package has only the 32-bit disk.

What you have to do is call (or email) to order the 64-bit disk, at a cost of an additional $5.00 shipping (plus tax). I would not expect anyone that went through this experience to this point to be exactly happy at the results so far. While the Microsoft representative was pleasant and professional, the task is hopelessly flawed from the start. After waiting two weeks, I get a disk that will not work, and I cannot order online, but have to place a phone order and pay more and wait longer to get what I needed in the first place.

I promised I would restrain my commentary (and I do not like to use profane language anyway, it shows a lack of imagination). From a consumer standpoint, this is a disaster looking for a hungry tort lawyer. If I had been required to choose a version at order time and had picked the wrong one, requiring a fee to exchange or otherwise get the proper disk might be defensible, even if stubborn and petty from a public relations perspective. While I got a FedEx delivery promised, and I doubt Microsoft really recouped their costs for the $5.00, it is really hard to swallow why I should pay for their mistakes.

I will probably follow up on this, because I am not sure that the full Retail package I am supposed to get will install as an upgrade. But I did get the tech support number to call to find out if this can be done. I hope so, because while I have backups of all my data, reinstalling all of my programs and reconfiguring everything will be tedious, and would frustrate me endlessly, because many of them were just installed or reinstalled in the few months since I got this new machine.

Seeing Red…

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

Sheer lunacy is my opinion of a recent education strategy study by a governmental agency. One of the conclusions is that teachers should not mark papers with a red pen, because it is too aggressive. Just add that in with other prohibitions made in other locations that have banned competitive playground activities like tag and dodge-ball. Or sports awards dinners where every child gets some sort of trophy for their participation, regardless of how little they contributed.

This is nothing short of a social emasculation of youngsters, with a subtext that competition is bad, cooperation is good. Both competition and cooperation are essential attributes for progress and survival. We all learn from our mistakes, downplaying mistakes by marking papers in a less aggressive color does nothing to improve learning. Rewarding everyone for participating, regardless of excellence, does nothing for motivation. And children who are uncomfortable with optional playground activities will simple refuse to participate.

Somewhere some people have lost track of the ideal of equality of opportunity, and have started trying to regulate an equality of outcome. This flies in the face of common sense approaches to progress. People are very different from each other, and few have anywhere close to the same set of competencies; no one has all strengths and no weaknesses. If we do not provide the feedback to children that allows them to recognize what they can do well and what they can’t, we will end up with a whole generation of bankers that hate math, socially backward salesmen, tone deaf musicians, color blind artists and brilliant teachers.

Oh, sorry, I guess we do have some brilliant teachers now… just not the ones that wrote that report.

Infamous deeds

Sunday, December 7th, 2008

Today is Pearl Harbor day. While it happened almost a lifetime away, 67 years ago, and almost ten years before I was born, it has had an impact on me, and the entire world. And while it was a tragedy, it shaped this nation in ways that are still very visible.

The first effect of the unprovoked attack of our fleet at Pearl Harbor was to awaken the U.S. to the fact that we were not isolated enough from Asia and Europe to avoid involvement. This wakeup was painful, thousands died and there was tremendous property damage, less than what happened sixty years later on 9/11, but not by any order of magnitude. People were shocked loose from their bearings, and great sympathy for the victims and a powerful anger ensued, and America was now in the war, and in it to win.

World War Two was very costly. A large portion of a whole generation of young men were lost in the battles. Marriages and families were delayed, and women, children and old men were left behind to run the farms and the factories to produce the food and supplies needed for the effort. Women learned to rivet, weld and other “manly” tasks, putting the final nails in the coffin for the ideas that women were the “weaker sex”. And while the armies made do with little, civilians at home also struggled, with rationing implemented for meat, butter, sugar, tires and countless other basic needs.

We all know the war was won. But the social events that began at the end of the war reshaped America, and much of the rest of the world, with a legacy that continues today. At the end of the war, there was a whole generation of men (less the war casualties) who had been to other parts of the U.S., and the world, and would never be content to go back and stay on the farm where they were raised. They had friends from States all over that they wanted to see again, and the automobile had come of age. From this, the motel was born, you see many from that era in rural areas even today, placed along a highway somewhere between point “A” and point “B”. And the demand for new and improved highways grew, spawning such seeming dream roads as the Pennsylvania Turnpike.

All the marriages that were delayed began to happen rapidly. And the delayed families from the marriages before the war began flowing at the same time as families from new marriages, producing a large population spike known as the “baby boom” (this is where I fit into the story). Of course, all those new families needed housing, an industry that changed from small individual enterprises to large companies creating big, even huge subdivisions. Schools were needed for all these children (and I remember large classes and portable buildings almost throughout my elementary school years).

Of course, all this building, and supplying the materials for it, and the road building, and supplying the materials for it, and the demand for automobiles, appliance, steel and countless other elements in the process created a great demand for workers of all stripes, including the teachers needed to educate all the youngsters.

America moved off the farm, into subdivisions and into a world of economic prosperity like nothing ever seen before. While there were many parts of the world that had a long struggle to replace the bombed and burnt parts of their countries, America had little domestic damage beyond Pearl Harbor itself. But World War Two changed America from a nation suffering a long standing economic malaise and content to remain distant from the rest of the world into a booming economic powerhouse, active in world affairs and generous in its support of the victims of the war and natural disasters.

While we may have overreached from time to time since, we are still a generous and involved part of the world, and the road to that change began when the first bomb dropped at Pearl Harbor.

Secret food tax

Friday, December 5th, 2008

In the name of global warming, the emissions from cattle are being targeted by the EPA as part of the problem. Good sense is not being used, because before we raised cattle in the U.S., huge sections of the country were heavily populated with Bison, an animal so closely related to Cattle that they can interbreed, and after that, wild Cattle roamed the Southwestern U.S., until they were rounded up and then eventually fenced in. So animal based emissions are not the root of the problem, but they are targeted to be part of the solution.

This is the typical Bull droppings that governmental officials generate. In the rush to “do something” (and we will argue elsewhere about whether anthropogenic warming is a fairy tale or not) the easy targets are being attacked first. Cattle raisers are generally small family-operated businesses up to the point where the animals are slaughtered. The EPA has proposed a fee of over $80.00 per head per year for beef cattle. Folks, I have had to sell old cows before, and have received as little as $80.00 for one (but usually a couple hundred dollars). Calves sometimes sell for as little as $200.00.

I’m sure the EPA is inspired by all the vegans (like the idiots at PETA) that think we would all be better off if people ate less meat and we “planted more healthful crops”. Most ranchland is poor farming land. Cattle are wonderfully efficient at converting grass grown on marginal croplands into food. Nonetheless, they are tackling the wrong part of the problem because it is easy. Biological processes release methane. The earth produces it, it escapes from the ground in such pristine places as the arctic tundra.

But cattle raisers do not have the deep pockets to produce the prolonged battle that the real carbon emitters do. So the first rules are not aimed at coal companies or oil companies, but at cattle. Such wonderfully brave bureaucrats. However, since it takes most of two years to produce a good head of beef, this fee could raise the price of beef on the hoof 50%.

This fixes nothing, it’s a tax. More money to give away to banks and car companies, stolen from the people that work to produce the wealth we all share. This will cause inflation all on its own, because America will not quickly change their diet, and huge increases in food prices are bad for families and are just bad politics. Mr. Obama, do you want to be our first one-term black President? For instructions on how, just continue to allow this sort of misguided policy to be implemented.